Book on
fertility and diet stirs buzz, skepticism
By Judy Foreman
December 24,
2007
Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health
have created a buzz with their new - and
controversial - book, "The Fertility Diet."
The book doesn't actually come right out and claim
that the new Harvard diet is a cure for infertility.
But that's the message desperate couples could be
forgiven for getting, given its title, some of the
authors' public statements, the intense media hype,
and, of course, the clout of almost anything with
the Harvard imprimatur. That's why some critics are
upset.
The book, by epidemiologists Drs. Walter Willett and
Jorge Chavarro and writer Patrick J. Skerrett, is
based on the authors' research, published in the
November issue of "Obstetrics and Gynecology."
In that paper, the authors reported on 17,544 women
participating in the Nurses' Health Study who
recorded their diets and their quests to get
pregnant in biennial questionnaires.
The study found that women had a lower risk of
infertility due to anovulation - the failure to
produce a viable egg every month - if they ate a
diet that emphasized monounsaturated fats like olive
oil over trans fats often found in baked goods;
vegetable proteins such as in beans and nuts rather
than animal sources such as red meat; whole grains
instead of refined carbohydrates that cause too
rapid a rise of blood sugar and insulin; some whole
milk, a little ice cream or other high-fat dairy
products daily; multivitamins containing folic acid;
and iron from plants and supplements.
The study is groundbreaking because it "is one of
the first times that anyone has shown that what you
eat and drink can impact the reproductive system,"
said Alice Domar, a psychologist who heads the Domar
Center for Mind/Body Health at Boston IVF, one of
the country's largest infertility centers.
But it's a huge leap to go from a statistical
correlation to actually giving advice. The authors
veer toward prescription when they say in their
book, "We have discovered 10 simple changes that
offer a powerful boost in fertility for women with
ovulation-related infertility." Ditto, in a cover
story they wrote for the Dec. 10 issue of Newsweek,
when they said their recommendations are aimed at
preventing and "reversing" infertility - a
conclusion Willett defended in an interview.
Observational studies like the Nurses' Health Study
do not prove that a behavior causes or prevents a
health problem, only that it might do so. To prove
that diet affects fertility, researchers would have
to take a group of women with diagnosed infertility
and randomly put half on a special diet and half on
a regular diet and compare conception rates.
This would be an interventional study, which would
have come closer to the "gold standard" of medical
research and would have provided the solid ground to
offer advice. Such a study could also show how long
a woman would need to eat this way to affect her
fertility.
Dr. Guy Ringler, a fertility specialist at
California Fertility Partners and a board member of
the American Fertility Association, cautioned in an
e-mail that the new findings are interesting but
"not sufficient to conclude that a modified diet in
an infertile population would improve fertility.
There need to be randomized, prospective studies
comparing the different diets before such claims
could be made."
So where's the harm in a little hype? Since the diet
is basically a healthy one, except for the
controversial suggestion to eat more high fat dairy,
including ice cream, it is unlikely to cause direct
harm. But a woman who follows the diet and still
doesn't get pregnant may blame herself, even though
the diet isn't proven effective.
Worse yet, a woman may follow the diet and postpone
seeing a doctor. "If you're 22 and you follow this
diet for six months, that's no big deal. But if
you're 42, you can't afford to postpone seeing a
doctor and try this diet in the meantime," said
Domar.
Dr. Gil Wilshire, a reproductive endocrinologist at
Boone Hospital Center in Columbia, Mo., put it even
more strongly: "This book is blatantly
irresponsible. I am going to be cleaning up the
damage from this book for years to come. I will be
having women who wasted one, two, three years of
their lives with imprecise, ineffective treatment.
Those are precious years you can't get back."
But the book has obvious market appeal. Infertility
is a source of heartache for more than 6 million
American couples, although infertility due to
problems with ovulation only account for about
one-quarter of these cases. The diet won't help if
male biology - such as inadequate production of
viable sperm - is the problem, as the authors
themselves note. Or if the woman has blocked
fallopian tubes or fibroids that impair the lining
of the uterus.
All this said, the observations make biological
sense, particularly the idea that certain foods may
influence levels of hormones involved in ovulation
and conception.
For instance, a diet high in refined carbohydrates
is detrimental to ovulation because it sends blood
sugar and insulin, the hormone that escorts sugar
into cells, skyrocketing, Willett said in a
telephone interview. Too much insulin makes the
ovaries overproduce testosterone, the male hormone.
Meanwhile, insulin reduces production by the liver
of a protein called SHBG (sex hormone binding
globulin), which captures testosterone. The net
result of these processes is too much testosterone
in the bloodstream, which can impede ovulation.
The ice cream recommendation is surprising, Willett
acknowledged, and a bit tricky to explain. But his
research suggested that "higher fat dairy products
were related to better fertility and lower fat dairy
was related to lower fertility. The reason? We're
only speculating, but it may well be that the
relatively modest amounts of estrogen and
progesterone that are present in the fatty part of
whole milk can have a positive effect on fertility,"
he said.
The Harvard team is not recommending a switch to
high-fat dairy for a whole lifetime - if consumed
long-term, high fat dairy products can increase the
build-up of fatty plaques in artery walls,
contributing to heart attacks.
The take-home message? If you're having trouble
getting pregnant, see your doctor before you hit the
bookstore.
Judy Foreman’s column runs every other week. Past
columns are available on
www.myhealthsense.com.
Listen to her live
call-in webcast radio show every Wednesday night
from 8:30 to 9:30 EST on
http://www.healthtalk.com.
To Latest News
To Women's Issues
To
2007 General Medicine
|
|